Common questions
Is Buzz Legal a firm of solicitors?
No. Buzz Legal Ltd is not a firm of solicitors and is not regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. We do non-reserved work: contracts, terms, employment documents, handbooks, privacy notices, shareholder agreements, debt chasing and dispute preparation. Six activities are reserved to authorised firms under the Legal Services Act 2007 — conducting litigation, rights of audience, reserved instrument activities covering most conveyancing, probate, notarial activities and administering oaths — and we do none of them. Those go to RHF Solicitors, authorised and regulated by the SRA (no. 324115). Robert Festenstein is a solicitor, and when he acts on a reserved matter he does so at RHF, not as part of Buzz Legal Ltd.
How do I know whether my problem needs a solicitor?
Ask two questions. Is it reserved — a court claim, conveyancing, probate? And is it contentious — has the other side instructed solicitors, threatened proceedings, or issued a claim? A yes to either means a solicitor. A no to both means it is almost certainly work we can do: drafting, reviewing, preventing, negotiating, preparing. The grey area is a matter that is heated but not yet formal, and the honest answer there is that it depends on how it is handled from here. If you are not sure, send it over and ask. We would rather tell you it belongs somewhere else than bill you for the wrong thing.
What do I lose by not using a regulated firm?
Three specific protections, and they are worth naming rather than glossing over. There is no SRA compensation fund available for our own work. There are no compulsory solicitors' professional indemnity arrangements. And complaints about our work cannot be taken to the Legal Ombudsman — they go through our own complaints procedure, which commits to acknowledgement within five working days, a substantive response within twenty working days, and a review by a senior person who was not involved if that response does not settle it. Anything RHF Solicitors does carries the full regulatory framework. Where the stakes make those protections worth paying for, we will say so rather than argue you out of it.
Can you represent me at a tribunal or in court?
No. Conducting litigation and exercising a right of audience are reserved activities, so a court claim goes to RHF Solicitors. Employment tribunal representation is not strictly reserved, but it is specialist contentious work and we route it the same way rather than pretending otherwise. What we do is the preparation, and it is not a consolation prize: working out what the dispute is really about and what you can prove, assembling the chronology and the evidence, drafting the letter before action and following pre-action conduct. A good proportion of matters end there. Where they do not, the prepared file goes across, so regulated hours are spent on the case rather than on reading in.
Why is Buzz Legal cheaper?
Because we carry less regulatory cost and we do a narrower range of work. An SRA-regulated firm funds compulsory professional indemnity arrangements, compensation fund contributions, a client account and continuous compliance reporting. We fund none of that, because we do not do reserved work and do not handle client money. We also quote a fixed price against a written scope instead of running an hourly meter, which removes any incentive to take longer. To put numbers on it: a contract review starts at £249 +VAT, and at the £200 to £350 +VAT hourly rates commonly quoted for this work, that same money buys somewhere between 45 minutes and an hour and a quarter.
Can you start a matter and hand it over if it escalates?
Yes, and it is often the cheapest route. We do the non-reserved groundwork — gathering evidence, drafting the letter before action, negotiating — and most matters end there. If one has to be litigated it moves to RHF Solicitors with everything already assembled, so you are not paying twice for the same background. The handover is not a cold referral to a stranger, because RHF is already connected to Buzz Legal and has sight of the file. What we will not do is hold on to a matter that has become contentious in order to keep billing it. The moment it crosses that line, you hear about it.
When should I skip Buzz Legal and go straight to a solicitor?
When a claim has already been issued, by you or against you. When the deadline in front of you is a legal limitation date rather than a commercial one. When the sum at stake is large enough that you want the SRA compensation fund and the Legal Ombudsman standing behind every part of the work. When the matter is conveyancing, probate, immigration or criminal. And when you simply prefer a solicitor from the outset, which is a perfectly reasonable preference — say so and we will take you straight to RHF rather than talk you round. Coming to us first in any of those situations costs you time, and time is usually what matters most once a clock is running.